Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Re-Thinking The Sunday Church Service (Part 7) - The Church Meeting Described In The Bible (2)

Read the entire series here.

In Part 6, I concluded that the passage found in 1 Corinthians 11:17 through chapter 14 was in the context of the church meeting. I also noted how many people were involved in the church meeting, and this can be seen by the following:

  • "But to each one is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good" (12:7)
  • "For to one is given...and to another... and to another...and to another...and to another...and to another...and to another...and to another...and to another..." (12:8-10)
  • "...but that the members may have the same care one for another" (12:25)
  • "...but if all prophesy..." (14:24)
  • "...when you assemble, each one has a..." (14:26)
  • "For you can all prophesy one by one, so that all may learn and all may be exhorted;..." (14:31)
It seems here, whatever the interpretation of Paul's exhortation that the women shouldn't speak, that either all members of the assembly speak and contribute to the edification of all, or at the very least, all the men do this. All of the members are active in the edification of all the others? This isn't the modern American model at all.
This isn't, either, a primer for charismatic church services. If the biblical model has everybody doing the task of edification, and the sign gifts of tongues and prophesy (whatever that was in the NT era) have since ceased, then does that necessitate the complete abandonment of the "everybody involved" so that only the preacher and choir do edifying things? Wouldn't we still follow this model (even without tongues of prophesying) that includes everybody edifying everybody?

Part 6 . . . . . . . . Part 8

2 comments:

  1. I love this series.

    I have been part of some services that looked like the Description in Corinthians. Not enough.

    Keep up the pressure.

    ReplyDelete
  2. My comment on Paul in the rich young ruler thread will explain this problem very clearly for you.

    ReplyDelete