Read the entire series here.
In Part 7, I noted that the 1 Corinthians passage showed all the members of the assembly involved in edifying the whole body. It would be interesting to know how many people were there in Corinth. Although I see no limit placed on the number of people in an assembly, I think it might be rather difficult to do this in the context of a 10,000 member mega-church. Does this say anything about the size of a church? Maybe it does. But there are successful large churches who claim to succeed by breaking down into much smaller groups at other times during the week for more personal interaction. Are large churches that don't break down into smaller groups as successful? Can edification take place in these smaller groups? Is there an advantage to doing things this way? Could we call these smaller groups "church"? Questions, questions, questions.
Part 7 . . . . . . . . Part 9
I agree.
ReplyDeleteI just heard about this poor 92 year old man who froze to death in his home in Michigan. His electric power had been turned off. He froze to death in the dark.
My first thought was, where's the church (or Mosque or Synagogue) in all this?
His wife had died. Who did the funeral? Why hadn't they stayed in touch with him.
Too big is too big. Anything over a thousand becomes a problem.